logoThe People's Perspective on Medicine

More Male Orgasms May Mean Less Prostate Cancer

Is sex really good for the prostate? Do more male orgasms protect men from prostate cancer? This question has been asked for decades. Now there's an answer.
Sex older couple happy

We know that headline will make a lot of men smile. A scientific excuse for more orgasms seems like good news indeed. Not surprisingly, newspapers, tabloids and other media outlets had a field day with this research story:

“Harvard Study Says Men Should Climax 21 Times Per Month to Lower Risk for Prostate Cancer”AskMen, July 5, 2017

“Ejaculating at Least 21 Times a Month Significantly Reduces a Man’s Risk of Prostate Cancer” Daily Mail, July 5, 2017

“Jerking Off Cuts Prostate Cancer Risk By 33 Percent: Male Orgasm Flushes Out Harmful Toxins, Theory Says” Medical Daily, July 5, 2017

“Ejaculating 21 Times a Month Could Save Your Life” Body and Soul, July 4, 2017

How Good is the Science?

A lot of women are probably saying…really? How good is the science?

Let’s start with the researchers themselves. These investigators are solid. The lead author, Jennifer Rider, ScD, is an Assistant Professor of Medicine at Harvard Medical School and an Assistant Professor of Epidemiology at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health. Another highly regarded author is Edward Giovannucci, MD, ScD, Professor of Nutrition and Epidemiology at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health. The other participants were equally prestigious and none of the authors declared a conflict of interest.

The Study:

This was a large, prospective cohort study involving 51,529 male health professionals (European Urology, Volume 60 Issue 6). They were recruited starting in 1986 and have been followed ever since. The volunteers fill out detailed questionnaires that reveal medical history, lifestyle issues, diet, use of supplements, preventive behaviors and chronic disease risk factors. In 1992 over 30,000 men answered detailed questions about their ejaculation frequency.

Over the course of this long study, 3,839 men developed prostate cancer. In 2004 a preliminary analysis of the Health Professionals Follow-up Study uncovered a:

“statistically significant inverse association between monthly ejaculation frequency and PCa [prostate cancer] risk based on 8 yr of follow-up.”

That finding was published in JAMA (April 7, 2004). They noted at that time that men who reported more than 21 ejaculations a month had a 50% lower risk of developing prostate cancer compared to men who averaged 4 to 7 ejaculations per month.

An additional decade of follow-up concluded:

“More frequent ejaculation in the absence of risky sexual behaviors could represent an important means of reducing the profound medical costs and physical and psychological side effects of unnecessary diagnosis and treatment of low-risk tumors, even though it appears to be less strongly associated with aggressive disease.”

Other Research:

A much smaller study from Australia (Urologic Oncology, March 27, 2017) also noted an inverse association between ejaculatory frequency and prostate cancer, but described the evidence as “weak.”

A review of the scientific literature published in the Archivio Italiano di Urologia Andrologia (Sept. 30, 2015) concluded that:

“Frequent ejaculation seems to be protective from the development of prostate cancer.”

A Possible Explanation:

Let’s be perfectly honest. The Harvard research is intriguing. These researchers point out:

“While diet and physical activity may provide some promise for secondary prevention, there are no evidence-based recommendations to offer healthy adult men to reduce PCa risk. The few established disease risk factors–age, race, family history, and germline polymorphisms [genetics]–are not modifiable.

“Sexual behaviors represent potential modifiable risk factors and may influence PCa development through a variety of specific mechanisms. One biological mechanism involves prostatic accumulation of potentially carcinogenic secretions, which may create more opportunity for PCa development, sometimes referred to as the prostate stagnation hypothesis.”

It is unlikely that the National Institutes of Health will pay for research to examine the connection between male orgasms and prostate cancer. Whether the prostate stagnation hypothesis will hold up to scrutiny remains to be determined.

We welcome your thoughts on this controversial topic in the comment section below.

Rate this article
star-fullstar-emptystar-fullstar-emptystar-fullstar-emptystar-fullstar-emptystar-fullstar-emptystar-fullstar-emptystar-fullstar-emptystar-fullstar-emptystar-fullstar-emptystar-fullstar-empty
4.3- 28 ratings
About the Author
Joe Graedon is a pharmacologist who has dedicated his career to making drug information understandable to consumers. His best-selling book, The People’s Pharmacy, was published in 1976 and led to a syndicated newspaper column, syndicated public radio show and web site. In 2006, Long Island University awarded him an honorary doctorate as “one of the country's leading drug experts for the consumer.” .
Tired of the ads on our website?

Now you can browse our website completely ad-free for just $5 / month. Stay up to date on breaking health news and support our work without the distraction of advertisements.

Browse our website ad-free
Join over 150,000 Subscribers at The People's Pharmacy

We're empowering you to make wise decisions about your own health, by providing you with essential health information about both medical and alternative treatment options.

Showing
10
comments (15 total)
Comments
Add your comment

I suspect that when the study uses the word “orgasm” they are referring to “ejaculation” which, although they happen simultaneously in most men, are not the same. Some of us have learned to experience orgasms without ejaculating that are comparable in every way – intensity, frequency, duration, physical response, mental response, etc. – to those of our female partners.

The deeply ingrained cultural belief that male and female sexuality are very different and, even, incompatible is inaccurate and hurtful to individuals and society. I refer you to the research of Dr. William Hartman and Marilyn Fithian published in a book “Any Man Can” in 1984.

What about people with vasectomies???

It seems to me like sex, especially good sex, is one of the best ways to be healthier in general, i.e., not just with prostate cancer.

When my husband got prostate cancer 10 years ago I examined all the literature I could research and found only one definitive study that examined sexual activity, food, and many other factors. This Ontario government study found ONLY two risk factors: read meat and exposure to laptop radiation. No, I do not remember the name of the study, but we switched to a primarily Mediterranean diet and he retired and rarely uses a computer, and if he does sits as far away from the laptop and machinery as possible.

I first heard this from an internist who was my primary care physician around 25 years ago! He told me that frequent orgasms not only lowered the risk for developing prostate cancer but also lowered the risk for developing BPH (benign prostate hyperplasia).

Kinda one sided, isn’t it.

It’s not one sided. Many trans women retain a prostate. News about prostate health applies to those women.

What was the age range of the men in this study?

There is a certain degree of possibility to this. In my own practice I encourage continued frequent sexual activity for sexual as well as cardiac stimulation. Daily Cialis seems to satisfy both erection function as well as prostate function and appears to negate the need for drugs such as Flomax.

I think that Congress , based on the frequency of screwing the American public, has a vested interest in funding a test.

Is there a correlation between arthritic hands and prostate cancer?

* Be nice, and don't over share. View comment policy^